Preliminary Screening Results of Fabry Disease in Kidney Transplantation Patients: A Single-Center Study.

Fabry disease (FD) is a rare X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by the deficiency of alfa-galactosidase A (AGALA) and leads to progressive impairment of renal function in almost all male patients and in a significant proportion of female patients. FD is underdiagnosed or even misdiagnosed in patients undergoing kidney transplantation. We initiated a selective screening study for FD among kidney transplant patients in our center. In this study, 1095 male and female patients were included. Dried blood samples on Guthrie papers were used to analyze galactosidase A enzyme for male patients. Genetic analyses were performed in all female and male patients with low enzyme activity. In total, 648 female and 447 male patients with functioning grafts were evaluated. Among 1095 patients, 5 male patients had AGALA activity below threshold and 3 female patients had galactosidase alpha gene DNA variations. One male patient had a disease-causing mutation. The other 4 patients had polymorphisms causing low enzyme activity. All the 3 female patients had mutations that were associated with FD according to Human Gene Mutation Database (ID: CM025441). In contrast, these mutations were reported as unknown clinical significance in Clinvar (rs149391489). The patients with clinical findings suggesting FD were planned to be analyzed for Lyso Gb3. In our selective screening study, 8 variations were found among 1095 kidney transplantation patients, which needs further investigation to determine causes of FD. Clinical findings, physical examination, and family history are also necessary to evaluate the genetic changes as a mutation in this selected population.

Efficacy and Safety of ATG-Fresenius as an Induction Agent in Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Induction therapy is mostly recommended for deceased-donor transplantation, whereas it has some controversies in live-donor transplantation. In this study, we described the outcomes of live-donor renal transplant recipients who received ATG-Fresenius (ATG-F) induction. METHODS: Live-donor transplantations in patients over 18 years old with ATG-F induction between 2009 and 2015 were included. All patients received quadruple immunosuppression, one of which was ATG-F induction. Biopsies after the artery anastomosis (zero hour) and protocol biopsies at the 6th month and at the 1st first year were obtained. Acute graft dysfunction was defined as a 20% to 25% increase in creatinine level from baseline. All acute rejection episodes were biopsy-confirmed. All episodes were initially treated with intravenous methyl prednisolone (MP) or ATG-F if resistant to MP. Four hundred twenty-two patients with live-donor transplantation were evaluated. The mean age was 40 ± 13 (18-73) years. The mean panel-reactive antibody levels were 42% ± 30% and 45% ± 30% for class I and II, respectively. RESULTS: The mean mismatch number for living unrelated donors (n = 112) was 4.6 ± 1.0. Acute rejection rate was 29.1% (123 patients) within the first year. The mean cumulative ATG-F doses for per patient and per kilogram were 344 ± 217 mg and 5.1 ± 2.7 mg, respectively. Patient survival rates were 98.3% and 96.7% for 12 months and 60 months, respectively. Death-censored graft survival rates were 97.6% and 92.1% for 12 months and 60 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ATG-F induction provided excellent graft and patient survival rates without any significantly increased side effects. Increasing sensitized patient numbers, more unrelated donors, increasing re-transplantation numbers, and more desensitization protocols make ATG-F more favorable in an induction regimen.

Use of ATG-Fresenius as an Induction Agent in Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Anti-T-lymphocyte globulins (ATG) are most commonly used as induction agents in kidney transplantation (KT). In this study, we investigated the use of ATG as induction therapy in deceased-donor KT. METHODS: Among 152 deceased-donor KT recipients transplanted between January 2009 and December 2003, 147 with exact data were enrolled in this study. Delayed graft function was defined as dialysis requirement after KT. Greater than 10% panel-reactive antibody (PRA) was considered as positive. Total ATG (rATG-Fresenius) dosage and induction duration was evaluated. Mean age was 45 ± 10 years; 91 patients were male and 56 patients were female. Class I and class II PRA-positive patient numbers were 20 (13.6%) and 17 (11.5%), respectively. Pre-transplant dialysis vintage was 108 ± 63 months. Mean donor age was 42 ± 17, and cold ischemia time was 16 ± 5 hours. Eighty-nine patients (60%) had delayed graft function and needed at least one session of hemodialysis after transplantation. Cumulative ATG-F dosage was 676 ± 274 mg. The mean ATG-F cumulative dosage was 10.6 ± 3.8 mg/kg. At the end of first year, mean creatinine and proteinuria levels were 1.4 ± 1.0 mg/dL and 0.3 ± 0.4 g/d, respectively. RESULTS: Mean follow-up time was 32 ± 20 months. During follow-up, there were 14 graft failures and 11 patients died. Patient survival for 1 and 2 years were 93% and 92.3%, respectively. Death-censored graft survival rates for 1 and 2 years were 94.8% and 90.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ATG-F induction provides acceptable graft and patient survival in deceased-donor KT. ATG-F infusion is well tolerated. Infection rates seem to be acceptable compared with all transplantation populations.

Is a High Body Mass Index Still a Risk Factor for Complications of Donor Nephrectomy?

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The incidence of obesity is increasing all around the world and Turkey is no exception. In Turkey, 80.1% of all kidney transplants performed in 2013 were living donor kidney transplants. In this study we compare the early postoperative complications of living kidney donors with a body mass index (BMI) over 30 to those with BMIs under 30. PATIENTS AND METHOD: All donor nephrectomies performed at the Ege University School of Medicine Hospital between May 2013 and May 2014 were included in the study. Donors' demographics, preoperative BMI, operation time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and perioperative blood creatinine levels were analyzed. RESULTS: There were a total of 72 donors, 50 of whom had a BMI below 30 (group 1), whereas 22 had a BMI of 30 or higher (Group 2). The median age was 47 (±12.6) and 52.2 (±8.4) for Groups 1 and 2, respectively. The median BMI was 26.1 (±2.3) for Group 1 and 31.8 (±1.5) for Group 2. There was no significant difference in operation time (P = .980) between the 2 groups. There was no difference in the length of hospitalization with an average hospital stay of 3 days for both groups. No major complications were observed in either group. There was no difference in minor complication rates for both groups. CONCLUSION: High BMI donors can safely donate their kidney with no significant increase in complication rates at high-volume transplantation centers.

Comparison of Preemptive Kidney Transplantation With Nonpreemptive Kidney Transplantation in a Single Center: A Follow-up Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The effect of preemptive transplantation of kidneys from living donors on patient and allograft survival is controversial. In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether preemptive kidney transplantation performed without the development of patient dialysis-related complications has a favorable effect on patient and graft survival. PATIENTS AND METHOD: The study included 334 adult renal transplant recipients. Patients who underwent renal transplantation between January 2008 and December 2012 at a tertiary referral teaching hospital were followed, and outcomes were obtained by retrospective chart review. A total of 244 patients underwent dialysis before renal transplantation, whereas 90 patients underwent preemptive transplantation. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with regard to patients and graft survival rates (P > .05). Patient survival rates in preemptive and nonpreemptive groups were 98.9% and 96.3% in the first year, respectively (P = .199). Graft survival rates in preemptive and nonpreemptive groups were 96.7% and 93.0% in the first year, respectively (P = .163). Patient survival rates in preemptive and nonpreemptive groups were 98.9% and 95.7% in the third year, respectively (P = .155). Graft survival rates in preemptive and nonpreemptive groups were 93.5% and 88.5% in the third year, respectively (P = .138). There was a significant difference among years with regard to ratio of patients with preemptive transplantation (P = .009). The ratio was 17.5% in 2008, whereas it rose to 43.1% in 2012. CONCLUSION: Although preemptive kidney transplantation does not provide a significant patient and allograft survival advantage compared to nonpreemptive kidney transplantation, both therapeutic modalities provide good outcomes. Preemptive kidney transplantation has been an increasingly frequent renal replacement therapy option in recent years.

Comparison of Patients in Whom Double-J Stent Had Been Placed or Not Placed After Renal Transplantation in a Single Center: A Follow-up Study.

BACKGROUND: Double-J (DJ) stents play an important role in modern urology to prevent undesirable side effects after surgery. We aimed to investigate the relationship of DJ stents with the demographic characteristics, surgical complications, urinary tract infection (UTI), and hematuria in the patients who underwent renal transplantation (Tx). METHODS: Data of 354 patients who underwent renal Tx between 2008 and 2011 at Ege University were evaluated retrospectively; 331 patients were included in this study. The term DJ (-) represents patients in whom a DJ stent was not placed. "Primary DJ term" represents patients in whom the DJ stent was placed during the first Tx. "Secondary DJ term" represents the patients who had DJ after Tx for any complication. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-four (76.7%) patients were in the DJ (-) group, 52 (15.7%) were in the primary DJ group, and 25 (7.6%) were in the secondary DJ group. There were significant differences between the groups in terms of anastomosis type (P = .000), stay-in-hospital time (P = .000), surgical complication (P = .000), re-operation (P = .000), percutaneous nephrostomy (P = .000), UTI (P = .000), first-time UTI (P = .000), recurrent UTI (P = .000), positive hemoculture (P = .000), hematuria (P = .000), duration of dialysis before Tx (P = .000), live/deceased donor (P = .000), and delayed graft function (P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Our choice is to use the DJ stent in selected high-risk patients and to keep the indications for DJ stent wider in deceased donor transplants by considering possible surgical complications. The use of the stent only in selected cases will decrease surgical complications due to stent placement.

Use of suicidal deaths as kidney donors: a single-center experience.

OBJECTIVE: Although the number of end-stage renal disease patients on the waiting list has increased, the number of deceased kidney donors has not increased proportionately. Therefore, the use of kidney donors defined as "marginal" has become an issue. Since the acceptance of deaths due to poisoning or suicide as donors has been proposed, we evaluated the clinical courses of kidney transplantations from suicidal death donors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed retrospectively the outcomes of nine deceased donor kidneys (8 males) from suicide victims between 2001 and 2012. Demographic and clinical characteristics of donors and recipients were collected from medical files. RESULTS: The mean donor age was 27.8 ± 11.9 years. Causes of death were: gunshot wounds to the head (n:4), pesticide intoxication (n:2), methanol intoxication (n:1), hanging (n:1), or carotid artery laceration (n:1). Mean donor creatinine level, urine output per hour, and 24-hour urine volume were 0.94 ± 0.53 mg/dL, 270 ± 113 mL, and 5496 ± 832 mL, respectively. Mean cold ischemia time was 12.3 ± 5.7 hours. Primary allograft nonfunction occurred in one recipient requiring nephrectomy. The average posttransplantation creatinine level at 1 year was 1.19 ± 0.62 mg/dL. The mean follow-up was 55 ± 49 months. Allograft loss occurred due to chronic rejection in three patients at 10, 37, and 40 months. Five patients are still undergoing follow-up with functioning grafts. CONCLUSION: Brain death cases caused by the suicide should be considered for organ donation.

Kidney transplant recipients with functioning grafts for more than 15 years.

BACKGROUND: Renal transplantation is the best renal replacement therapy because it significantly improves patient survival. The developments in transplantation and increasing number of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have unmasked long-term complications secondary to immunosuppressive drugs and chronic renal failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty-six renal transplant recipients with grafts that have functioned more than 15 years were included in the study. This cross-sectional retrospective analysis of demographic, clinical, and laboratory findings was conducted in 3 Turkish transplantation centers. The mean age was 30.4 ± 10.2 years at the time of the transplantation. The mean time between the transplantation and the study was 19.1 ± 3.6 years. At the time of the study, mean creatinine level was 1.52 ± 0.60 mg/dL, 70.09% of the patients displayed glomerular filtration rates <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Urinary protein excretion was 0.57 ± 0.65 g/d. Hypertension and hyperlipidemia were the most common comorbid diseases. Twelve patients had diabetes and 9 cardiovascular disease. Seventeen patients had been diagnosed with skin and 5 with non-skin cancer. CONCLUSIONS: As the number of recipients with long-term functioning grafts increases, long-term complications become evident, particularly chronic renal failure. Survivors should be evaluated regularly and treated early for risk factors and complications to improve long-term graft and patient survival.

Clinical everolimus experience in pediatric renal transplant patients.

OBJECTIVE: Everolimus is a potent immunosuppressive agent that has antiproliferative activities. This study sought to share our experience among renal transplanted children who required conversion from calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) to the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Exclusion criteria were multiple organ transplantations, loss of a previous graft due to immunologic reasons, receipt of an organ donated after cardiac death, donor age <5 years or >65 years, panel reactive antibodies >25%, platelets <75,000/mm(3), absolute neutrophil count of <1,500/mm(3), leucocytes <2,500/mm(3), hemoglobin <6 g/dL, severe liver disease, cold ischemia time >40 hours or anti-HLA panel-reactive antibodies >50%. RESULTS: Eighteen renal transplant patients (10 male, 8 female) underwent conversion to everolimus from CNI: 8 from cyclosporine (CsA) and 10 from tacrolimus. The mean age was 12.6 ± 0.9 years and the mean body mass index 21.8 ± 1.7 kg/m(2). The mean 2-hour postdose level of CsA before conversion was 671 ± 142 ng/mL; the patients on tacrolimus showed a mean trough concentration of 4.5 ng/mL. Six (33,3%) were taking mycophenolate mofetil and 12 (66.6%) enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium. No significant changes were observed in either hepatic functions, serum lipids, or hemograms. There was no mortality or graft loss. The mean level of serum creatinine was 1.3 ± 0.7 mg/dL before and 1.09 ± 0.6 mg/dL after conversion. Proteinuria observed in only 1 patient was well controlled with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy. All patients responded to statin therapy. One patient developed unilateral lower extremity edema and 1 a lymphocele. Although there were 3 cases (14%) of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, there was no mortality or graft loss. CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus conversion has become an excellent choice, offering safety and efficacy with good outcomes.

Use of kidney donors with hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or brain tumor: a single-center experience.

INTRODUCTION: With the rapid increase in the number of patients on the waiting lists, the idea of using organs from donors who were previously classified as "marginal" has emerged. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the patients who received kidneys from donors with hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or brain tumors. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Between 2003 and 2010, 27 transplantations were performed from donors with hepatitis B, hepatitis C or brain tumors between 2003 and 2010. Demographic and clinical characteristics of donors and recipients were retrospectively collected from medical files. RESULTS: Fifteen patients received kidneys from donors with hepatitis B: 9 from deceased donors having a positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and six from living donors with positive HBsAg having negative results of qualitative hepatitis B DNA analysis. Two of the fifteen recipients were previously diagnosed with chronic active mild hepatitis B infection. The remaining 13, who were HBsAg (-)/anti-HBs(+) at the time of transplantation, underwent hepatitis B immune globulin and lamivudine therapy. Median follow up time was 40 ± 35 months. One patient developed decompensated liver disease owing to noncompliance to lamivudine therapy. Five patients who received grafts from anti-HCV(+) deceased donors were anti-HCV(+) at the time of transplantation with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels <40 U/L. All grafts remained functional at a median of 70 months. Seven subjects received grafts from deceased donors with brain tumors, none of whom had a history of a craniotomy or a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. All recipients had serious vascular access problems. No graft loss or de novo malignancies was observed among these patients after a median follow-up of 69 ± 26 months. CONCLUSION: With appropriate patient selection, the donated organ pool can be expanded by addition of donors with hepatitis or brain tumors.

What kind of changes occurred in clinical characteristics of deceased kidney donor recipients after national allocation system in Turkey? A single-center retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical characteristics of recipients of deceased donor renal transplantations were evaluated in the period before versus after implementation of The National Allocation System (NAS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated retrospectively clinical profiles of the 42 after NAS (June 2008-December 2010) versus 42 consecutive deceased donor renal transplantation patients before NAS. Patient and graft survival rates were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method; graft function was assessed based on creatinine clearance with the Cockcroft Gault equation. Patient and donor data were obtained from medical records. RESULTS: Recipients were older in the pre-NAS group (39 ± 8 vs 33 ± 8 years, respectively; P = .001) and median duration of preoperative dialysis was longer in the post-NAS group (103 ± 61 months vs 50 ± 36 months, respectively; P = .000). The average number of human leukocyte antigen-mismatched antigens were pre-NAS 3.4 ± 1.0 versus post-NAS 3.9 ± 1.2 (P = .05). Considering the recipients serological status 9 were hepatitis C virus (HCV)(+) and 2 hepatitis B virus (HBV)(+) among the post-NAS versus no HBV(+) and only 1 HCV(+) patient pre-NAS. Kaplan-Meier analysis of graft survival rates showed 90% at 1 and 85% at 3 years pre-NAS. Similar to 95% at 1 and 86% at 3 years for the post-NAS group (P > .05). Likewise, patient survival rates for both groups at 1 and 3 years were 97%. The mean parameter of donor age, allograft loss, cold ischemia time, patient death, number of retransplantations, HBV(+) patients, and delayed graft function were similar between groups (P > .05). DISCUSSION: After NAS the transplant recipients were older, had a longer duration of dialysis, greater number of HLA mismatched antigens and, more HCV(+). No differences were observed in short-term patient and graft survival rates.

Long-term outcomes of kidney transplants with multiple renal arteries: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether kidney transplantations performed using grafts with multiple arteries negatively affected renal function or increased the risk of vascular or urologic complications. METHODS: Among 249 kidney transplant patient followed for at least 1 year between 2000 and 2005, we retrospectively evaluated their donor renal artery anatomy to compare postoperative vascular and urologic complications: creatinine clearance at 1, 2, and 5 years, as well as graft survival at 3 and 5 years. RESULTS: While 214 (85.9%) displayed a single artery (group 1), 35 (14.1%) showed multiple renal arteries (group 2). Thirty-one of the group 2 allografts had two, three donors had three, and one had four arteries. The postoperative vascular and urologic complications and the creatinine clearance values at 1, 2, and 5 years of both groups were similar. The 3- and 5-year graft survivals among group 1 were 95% and 90%, whereas those of group 2 were 94% and 91% respectively (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Our study indicated that multiple renal arteries did not adversely affect postoperative urologic or vascular complications or kidney allograft or patient survival compared with single renal artery cases.

Spousal versus living unrelated renal transplantation: a retrospective analysis of allograft outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of spousal and living unrelated donor (LUD) allografts. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The 378 ABO-compatible living and cadaveric kidney transplantations between February 2005 and August 2010 included 25 wife-to-husband (group 1), 15 husband-to-wife (group 2), and 20 LUD cases (group 3). Donor nephrectomy was performed by open surgery. Induction therapy with antithymocyte globulin or anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibody was followed by maintenance regimens using cyclosporine (CsA) or tacrolimus (Tac) plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids. We compared spousal donor and LUDs in terms of clinical characteristics as well as graft and patient survival rates. RESULTS: Fifty-six (93.3%) patients underwent induction therapy with either antithymocyte globulin (n = 30) or anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibody (n = 26). Maintenance immunosuppression was administered with Tac + MMF (n = 37; 61.6%) or CsA + MMF (n = 23; 38.4) with corticosteroids. Mean follow-up was 34 ± 16 months. There were four graft losses and five patient deaths. There were no significant differences between spousal and living unrelated transplants in terms of clinical characteristics or biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed 3-year patient survival rates of 94%, 100%, and 88% in group 1, group 2, and group 3, respectively (P > .05). Overall graft survival rates were 94%, 100%, and 77% in group 1, group 2, and group 3, respectively (P > .05). Graft and patient survival rates were similar at 3 years for wife-to-husband, husband-to-wife, or LUDs. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, family members should be encouraged as LUD or spousal donors, based on similar patient and graft survival rates.

Biochemical parameters, renal function, and outcome of pregnancy in kidney transplant recipient.

INTRODUCTION: The number of women who would like to have a baby after renal transplantation has increased. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of pregnancy on the lipid profiles and renal functions among transplantation patients as well as the maternal and fetal results of pregnancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched files of female patients who underwent renal transplantation between 1998 and 2008 to discover 31 pregnancies among 24 women. RESULTS: Mean duration of dialysis and age at transplantation for the 24 cases were 22.7 ± 24.1 months (range, 0-72) and 21.2 ± 4.6 years (range, 13-34), respectively. The time between transplantation and conception as well as age at conception were 5.2 ± 1.9 and 26.4 ± 4.4 years, respectively. Creatinine levels in the second trimester were significantly lower (P = .000). Gestational bicarbonate and albumin levels were significantly lower (P = .009 and P = .001, respectively). There were significant differences between the preconception triglyceride (TG) and those in the second and third trimesters (P = .006 and P = .00, respectively). TG levels increased as trimesters progressed (P = .000). Moreover, TG levels were higher among patients taking cyclosporine. Of pregnancies that passed the first trimester, 88.4% resulted in live births. There were 23 (74.19%) live births among 31 pregnancies with a cesarean section rate of 58%. Of the cases, 16.1% delivered preterm and 19.4% of babies had low birth weights. CONCLUSION: We believe that women with renal transplants can have healthy babies with close monitoring during pregnancy and without any effect on graft survival.

Plasmapheresis therapy in renal transplant patients: five-year experience.

INTRODUCTION: Plasma exchange (PE) and double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) have been used successfully in renal transplant patients as well as those with various other diseases over the last decade. In this retrospective study, we sought to explore the outcomes of plasmapheresis in renal transplant patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We investigated 58 patients who received PE or DFPP therapy between 2005 and 2010. PE was performed using a Fresenius AS.TEC 204 device and DFPP, by an INFOMED HF 440 device. Indications for therapy, biopsy findings, number of PE/DFPP sessions, laboratory data, medications, complications as well as graft and patient survivals were recorded. RESULTS: Overall mean age of subjects was 34.1 ± 8.8 years and 55% were female. Sixteen patients underwent 95 DFPP sessions and 42 underwent 215 PE sessions. Indications for therapy were acute humoral rejection (n = 39), recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS; n = 8), thrombotic microangiopathy (n = 6), and chronic humoral rejection (n = 5). Responses to therapy were 24/39 for acute humoral rejection, 1/5 for chronic rejection, 4/8 for FSGS, and 3/6 for thrombotic microangiography. No complication was observed in any patient. CONCLUSION: PE/DFPP is a safe and successful method for treatment of acute humaral rejection as less so for recurrent FSGS and thrombotic microangiopathy. The outcomes among subjects with chronic humoral rejection were not satisfactory.

Regressive course of oxalate deposition in primary hyperoxaluria after kidney transplantation.

Primary hyperoxaluria (PH) is a rare autosomal recessive disease caused by the functional defect of alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase (AGT) enzyme in the liver and it is characterized by the deposition of diffuse calcium oxalate crystals. A 38-year-old male patient presented with history of recurrent nephrolithiasis and has received chronic hemodialysis treatment for 2 years. Cadaveric renal transplantation was applied to the case. The patient was reoperated on postoperative day 13 because of the collection surrounding the urethra. During this operation, kidney biopsy was made due to late decrease in creatinine levels. Deposition of diffuse oxalate crystal was detected in allograft kidney biopsy, whereas in the 0-hour biopsy there were no oxalate crystals. Oxalate level was found to be high in a 24-hour urine specimen (118 mg/L, normal level: 7-44 mg/L). The patient was identified with primary hyperoxaluria and followed up in terms of systemic oxalate deposition as well as allograft kidney. In the kidney biopsy taken after 18 months, we detected that oxalate crystals almost entirely disappeared. In our case, bilateral preretinal, intraretinal, and intravascular diffuse oxalate crystals were detected, and argon laser photocoagulation treatments were needed for choroidal and retinal neovascularization. Repeated ophthalmic examinations showed the regressive nature of oxalate depositions. In the 18th month, fundus examination and fluorescein angiography revealed that oxalate crystals were significantly regressed. To increase the quality of life and slow down the systemic effects of oxalosis, kidney-only transplantation is beneficial.

Incidence and importance of c4d deposition in renal allograft dysfunction.

Recent studies showed that peritubular capillary deposition of C4d is a marker of humoral immune responses directed against a renal allograft. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the incidence, clinical features, and prognostic implications of C4d deposition in renal allograft biopsy specimens. The biopsies had been performed due to acute graft dysfunction. This study of 104 renal allograft biopsies performed in 2004 classified histopathological findings according to Banff criteria. All paraffin-embedded biopsy samples were stained with an immunohistochemical method for C4d deposition. Demographic data, clinical findings, and biochemical findings were obtained from patients' charts. C4d staining was positive in 15/104 (14%) samples. The staining pattern was diffuse in 8 and focal in 7 patients. Nine patients were males. The overall mean age was 33 +/- 6 years. Ten received live-donor grafts. The biopsy occurred at a mean of 1007 +/- 1415 (range, 15-4712) days after the operation with a mean serum creatinine (SCr) level of 2.8 +/- 1.5 (1.25-6.0) mg/dL. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the occurrence time: early (before 100 days) and late (after 100 days). Among the early group (n = 5), the mean SCr level was 2.8 +/- 1.5 mg/dL; a diffuse staining pattern was seen in 4 (80%) patients. Histological findings were acute rejection in 3, borderline changes in 1, or thrombotic microangiopathy in 1 patient. Two patients were treated with pulse steroids and 3 with ATG, intravenous immunoglobulin, and plasmapheresis. Three patients lost their grafts at the mean of 118 +/- 100 days after the biopsy. In the late group (n = 10), the mean SCr level was 2.8 +/- 1.7 mg/dL with a diffuse staining pattern in 4 (40%) patients. The histological findings included acute rejection in 6, chronic vascular rejection in 2, thrombotic microangiopathy in 1, and chronic allograft nephropathy in 1 patient. Six patients were treated with pulse steroids, and 3 with ATG and intravenous immunoglobulin. Five patients lost their grafts at a mean of 200 +/- 270 days. The overall incidence of C4d deposition was 14%; it was seen both in the early and late posttransplantation period. Although a diffuse staining pattern was more frequently seen in the early period, C4d deposition indicated a poor allograft prognosis in both periods. Introduction of C4d staining into the routine may guide more specific treatments directed toward the humoral alloresponse.

Efficacy and safety of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in de novo and maintenance renal transplant patients.

Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (ECMPS) has been developed as an alternative agent to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), with the aim to provide reduction in gastrointestinal side effects. This open-label, single-arm, two-center prospective study sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of ECMPS used in combination with steroid and cyclosporine (CyA) in de novo and maintenance renal transplant patients with 12 months' follow-up. Twenty-one patients were recruited (mean age, 39 +/- 8 years) into the de novo group. Of these patients, 66% were male and 76.2% underwent living related kidney donation. The induction immunosuppression was ATG in 10 and basiliximab in 6 patients. At 12 months' posttransplantation, there was no graft or patient loss and two (10%) acute rejection episodes. None of the patients in this group discontinued the study medication due to drug-induced adverse events. One patient was excluded from the study because of recurrent oxalosis. Serum creatinine (SCr) levels at 3, 6, and 12 months after renal transplant were 1.30 +/- 0.3, 1.40 +/- 0.3, and 1.40 +/- 0.3 mg/dL, respectively. The maintenance group included 20 patients. Time posttransplantation (mean +/- SD) was 27 +/- 25 months. All patients in this group had been on maintenance azathioprine or MMF in combination with steroid and CyA. These patients were switched to ECMPS. They mean age was 36 +/- 8 years. Sixty-six percent of the patients were male and 57% received living donor kidneys. Acute rejection was nil, whereas two patients lost their grafts owing to chronic rejection in this group. Three patients were excluded from the study, one to discontinuation of the drug because of intractable diarrhea, the second to loss to follow-up, and the last case due to withdrawal of informed consent. Leukopenia was not observed in this group. The SCr levels prior to and at 3, 6, and 12 months after conversion to ECMPS were 1.80 +/- 1.0, 1.95 +/- 1.5, 1.50 +/- 0.8, and 1.60 +/- 0.8 mg/dL, respectively. This is the first phase IV study with ECMPS in the Turkish population. Renal function was preserved in both groups. Only 2.5% of patients were excluded because of side effects. Use of ECMPS in combination with prednisolone and CyA is an effective and safe therapeutic choice for both de novo and maintenance renal transplant patients.

Is "zero-hour" biopsy of the transplanted kidney risky?

"Zero-hour" renal allograft biopsy provides valuable diagnostic information for comparison to subsequent kidney material. However, the invasive nature of the biopsy procedure tends to limit its widespread use in many centers. We undertook this retrospective study to examine the rate and clinical importance of complications in our series of patients routinely undergoing zero-hour biopsies performed between 1994 and 2001. Two hundred thirty-six zero-hour biopsies included only one sample performed with a 14G needle from lower posterior part of kidney by using a manual tru-cut technique. Doppler ultrasonography was performed after first 5 days. An average of 34 +/- 19 glomeruli were obtained in the biopsies. The biopsy specimens were adequate for diagnosis in 77% of the procedures. Ten (4%) patients experienced complications of intraparenchymal arteriovenous fistula (n = 4), which regressed spontaneously; perirenal hematoma (n = 4); intraparenchymal hematoma (n = 2); and a minimal perirenal collection (n = 41). We conclude that zero-hour biopsy is a safe diagnostic method. The rate of complications is low, as well as generally mild and self-limiting.

Comparison of tacrolimus and cyclosporin in renal transplantation by the protocol biopsies.

Acute and chronic lesion scores on renal allograft protocol biopsies may predict long-term graft function. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of tacrolimus (Tac) and cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA) based immunosuppressive protocols using protocol biopsies from well-functioning renal allografts. 35 consecutive renal transplant patients were randomized to Tac (n: 17) versus CsA (n: 18) treatment arms. Patient age and sex, donor type and age, histocompatibility, cold ischemia time and prior delayed graft function were similar between the two groups. Treatment protocol consisted of prednisolone, azathioprine and Tac or CsA. Biopsies performed on the third, sixth and twelfth months were blindly evaluated by the same pathologist. The incidences of acute rejection (AR) episodes among CsA vs Tac groups were 33% vs 29%, respectively (NS). The Creatinine level was lower in Tac than CsA, although it was not significant (Table). Subclinical AR and subclinical chronic allograft nephropathy were detected on protocol biopsies in 3 (2 CsA, 1 Tac) and 12 (7 CsA, 5 Tac) patients, respectively. Acute lesion score at the third month PBx was significantly lower in the Tac group (p < 0.05). Chronic lesion scores in all biopsies were lower in the Tac group, although not significantly. The protocol biopsy findings suggest that graft injury may be less pronounced among the Tac group.